Moreover, there are potential risks involved with a cease-and-desist letter that an experienced lawyer can help you avoid. A person receiving a cease-and-desist letter may be able to file a lawsuit before you can, called a “Declaratory Judgment Action,” seeking to have your patent declared invalid by a court. A poorly drafted cease-and-desist letter may be more likely to invite a Declaratory Judgment Action. This kind of lawsuit takes significant control of the situation away from the patentee. For example, a patentee may not be ready, for any number of reasons, to begin litigation.
If the other side responds to a cease-and-desist letter, there may be an opening for negotiation. The other party may not want to litigate, for any number of reasons, for example, that they don’t think they can win, that the market does not justify the expense and risk of a trial, or that it is a better business decision to get a license and pay a royalty. We can help you with this kind of negotiation with an accused infringer.
Filing a Lawsuit
The ultimate legal remedy for patent infringement is filing a lawsuit. If an alleged infringer does not respond to a cease-and-desist letter or other contact, this is your only option. In some cases, a patentee may make a strategic decision to skip the step of sending a cease-and-desist letter and file a lawsuit as their first step in stopping an infringement.
Patent infringement lawsuits must be filed in a Federal Court and are complex proceedings in any circumstance. We are here to help you navigate the process and get a resolution as quickly and cost-effectively as possible.
Part 2. I Have Been Accused of Patent Infringement. What Should I Do?
Did You Receive A Cease-And-Desist Letter?
A patentee may send a cease-and-desist letter to alleged infringers, advising them to stop infringing or to take out a license to the patent.
You are under no legal obligation to respond to a cease-and-desist letter. So one option is to ignore it. There may be good reasons to engage in a negotiation with the other side. Another option is to preemptively file a lawsuit against the patent owner called a “Declaratory Judgment Action” that asks a court to declare a patent invalid or not infringed.
Even if your first thought is to ignore a cease-and-desist letter, you should discuss the letter and a strategy for responding (or not responding) with experienced attorneys. An experienced firm, such as CPBF, will take into consideration all relevant factors, including your business situation, the quality of the patent being asserted, and the alleged infringement. We will advise you on your options and recommend a course of action.
Did You Receive A Notice Telling You That You Have Been Sued?
Patent infringement lawsuits must be brought to Federal Court, so you may have received a notice or summons and complaint that you are being sued. A key point if this happens is that you should contact an experienced patent litigation firm such as CPBF immediately to address the situation. Do not ignore this. Ignoring a summons and complaint will probably result in a default judgment against you, which will likely be costly.
We can assess your situation and recommend the most appropriate course of action for your business situation. This may include seeking a prompt settlement or raising various defenses. The two most common defenses are that you are not infringing the claims or that the patent is invalid.
In a non-infringement defense, you will argue that your product or process is outside the scope of the issued patent claims.
In an invalidity defense, you will argue that the patent should never have been granted in the first place, so it is invalid. There are several grounds of invalidity, including that the patent is anticipated or obvious over prior art, or that the patent specification or claims do not meet the written description requirement. For example, the claims must be “definite” (clear and understood by a person of skill in the art), and “enabled” (which means that the patent method can be practiced without undue experimentation).
Inter-partes Review- An inter-partes review (IPR) is an administrative procedure at the USPTO for challenging the validity of an issued patent, alleging that the patent is obvious or anticipated. This is an important option for accused patent infringers, as an additional avenue to challenge the validity of a patent. We can help you decide if this is right for you, and we can prosecute an IPR for you at the USPTO.